METAMASK CONTRAT Issue: MATIC PROVIDE CONTRACT
A field of one public problem – this is when the contract
In this state,
Problem
When the contract does not less, the basic problem, which is prevalent by the Matteral balance.
`The focus
FUNCTION _FORWARDFUNDS () PAINED POPLY {
Require (msg.sender == Address (this), "only counteract can name this feature");
Trebat (Baytes (Mattiatbals) .LENGTH> 0, "No Matteral Balance on Kontact");
// The remaining part of the logic counteract ...
}
The problem is concluded in the pursuit:
The field is however, ask the mottal tokens from the blockchain, it should be rested to the counteract (Address (this)). This consumable distribution remains the contract in the biliary cycl.
There is no field, the function is unbroken without the resting logic.
solving
Kontract on Change Course for PROVERAL CONTROL CONTRACT AND BELIEVE
`The focus
FUNCTION _FORWARDFUDS () PAKE A POPLY {
Require (msg.sender == Address (this), "only counteract can name this feature");
// Pierce, there is a kho -nybud mattons on the counterattte
Uint256 MaticBalance = GetMaticBalance ();
IF (MATICBALANCE> 0) {
// Following the math tokens from the blockchain
_getmaticsfromblockchain (Matticalance);
} Still {
// Impering the case when the Matto balance is not the most
// For example, you can scrape the scrapes or return the concrete value
Brace;
}
}
Function GetMaticBalance () STATEBLE ATTENTION OF THE VOS (UINT256) {
// Realize logic for extinguishing tokens matic from blockchain
// This can be included in the calling off the contract or the midst of the blockchain
}
Function _Getmaticsfromblockchain (Uint256 MATICAMOUM) Intracerial {
// Realize logic for extinguishing tokens matic from blockchain
}
Make it with the balance of your contract, the resurrection of the problem.
conclusion
Kontrakta with a math balance can come from -wit manconfigured conders or non -permanent use. Underships with Metamask. Do not forget all the best projects